Willy Woo Says Bitcoin’s Bear Market Is Getting Worse, Not Better.

Willy Woo Says Bitcoin’s Bear Market Is Getting Worse, Not Better. History Says He Might Be Right — But Also Irrelevant.

A $100 Bitcoin investment in 2010 is worth $2.2 billion today. Every single person who held through that journey survived multiple moments exactly like this one. Here’s why the debate about the bottom misses the actual point.

Affiliate Disclosure: This article contains referral links. I may earn a commission if you sign up through the links below. All opinions and analyses are my own.

Bitcoin is sitting at $67,341 today. Down 47% from its October all-time high of $126,198. The Fear & Greed Index is still circling the drain. And Willy Woo, one of the most respected on-chain analysts in crypto, just posted something that should make every permabull uncomfortable.

“BTC is still strengthening its bear trend,” he wrote on X this morning. “Volatility is a key metric used by quants to detect trends. BTC entered its bear market when volatility spiked upward quickly. Vol then continues to climb, meaning the bear trend is strengthening.”

That’s not a guy calling a bottom. That’s a guy saying the bottom isn’t here yet.

But here’s where it gets interesting: at the same time this analysis is circulating, another post is going viral. The one showing that $100 invested in Bitcoin in 2010 — when BTC traded at $0.002 to $0.003 — would be worth somewhere between $2.2 billion and $3.3 billion today, even at the current “crashed” price of $67K.

These two stories aren’t contradicting each other. They’re completing each other. And if you understand why, you’re ahead of 99% of people arguing about where BTC will bottom.

The Three-Phase Bear Market Framework

Let me walk through what Woo is actually saying, because it matters.

As I read from The Crypto Times’ coverage of Woo’s thread today (https://www.cryptotimes.io/2026/02/18/analyst-willy-woo-says-bitcoin-bear-market-is-gaining-strength/), he frames bear markets in three distinct phases.

Phase 1 is when Bitcoin’s liquidity structure breaks down, and the price enters a downtrend. Smart money — typically whale wallets and institutional allocators — drives the initial move, and retail follows. Woo makes a specific accusation about this phase: “Perma bulls will blindly say it’s a correction inside a broader bull market, but will not give you any hard evidence of capital flowing in. They will only give narrative.”

Phase 2 is when global equities join the decline. This is where the pain becomes undeniable: the equity market dwarfs crypto—trillions in daily volume versus crypto’s billions. When stocks fall, all risk assets fall with them, and there’s no “decoupling” narrative to hide behind.

Phase 3 is capitulation. Fresh liquidity starts returning, outflows stabilise after peaking, and the market finds an actual bottom — not a narrative one.

Woo believes we’re at the end of Phase 1, approaching Phase 2.

This aligns with what other analysts are seeing. As reported by CNBC (https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/11/bitcoin-price-today-crypto-volatility.html), Steven McClurg, CEO of Canary Capital, expects Bitcoin could fall as low as $50,000 by summer. Bloomberg Intelligence strategist Mike McGlone went further in a CoinDesk piece (https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2026/02/16/bitcoin-s-slide-may-signal-broader-market-trouble-and-a-u-s-recession-mike-mcglone-says), arguing that Bitcoin could decline toward $10,000 if equity markets experience a major correction — though market analyst Jason Fernandes called that a "low-probability tail risk."

The debate on X is split: some traders see $67K as the cycle bottom; others expect $54K–$58K, sub-$40K, or even an August 2026 bottom. Nobody agrees. Which is itself a signal — consensus bottoms aren’t real bottoms.

The $100-to-Billions Story Is Real — And It’s Misleading

Now the other side. The viral post reminding everyone that $100 in 2010 Bitcoin is now worth billions. The math checks out. At roughly $0.003 per BTC, $100 would buy approximately 33,000 to 50,000 BTC. At today’s $67,300, that’s $2.2 billion to $3.3 billion.

As Bankrate documented (https://www.bankrate.com/investing/bitcoin-investment-worth-now/), even a $1,000 investment in Bitcoin in 2010 would be worth roughly $1.62 billion today. These are real numbers, not theoretical.

But here’s what the viral post leaves out — and what actually matters.

That $100 in 2010 lost 85% in 2011. An 84% crash in 2014–2015. A 77% crash in 2018. A 65% crash in 2022. And now a 47% (and counting) drawdown in 2025–2026.

The person who held from 2010 to today didn’t “invest and forget.” They survived at least four moments where the market consensus was that Bitcoin was dead, finished, a Ponzi scheme unwinding, a tulip mania collapsing.

The X post captured this well: a $100 stake hit $2 million in 2017, crashed to $200,000 in 2018, soared to $150 million in 2021, and dropped to $25 million in 2022. The emotional volatility of holding through those swings is the actual cost of those returns, not the $100.

This is where Willy Woo’s analysis and the $100 story converge: understanding which phase of the cycle you’re in doesn’t tell you where the bottom is. It tells you what kind of pain to expect, and whether you have the infrastructure to survive it.

Where the Bottom Debate Goes Wrong

The community on X right now is obsessed with finding the number. $60K? $54K? $40K? $38K?

VanEck published a detailed analysis (https://www.vaneck.com/us/en/blogs/digital-assets/matthew-sigel-what-triggered-bitcoins-major-selloff-in-february-2026/) showing Bitcoin's February 5 crash registered a -6.05σ move — one of the fastest single-day declines in crypto history. They also noted that Bitcoin is trading -2.88σ below its 200-day moving average, a level not observed in the past 10 years, including during COVID or the FTX collapse.

That’s statistically unprecedented territory. CryptoQuant flagged that Bitcoin broke below its 365-day moving average for the first time since March 2022, with a 23% decline in 83 days that’s worse than the early 2022 bear phase.

As CNN reported (https://www.cnn.com/2026/02/05/investing/bitcoin-priceThe digital gold narrative has fundamentally broken down this cycle. Bitcoin is down 47% from its October high, while gold has surged — gold futures up 24% in the same period. When actual fear hit, money went to the 5,000-year-old store of value, not the 17-year-old one. Treasury Secretary Bessent confirmed the government won't stabilise crypto markets. The ETF infrastructure that was supposed to legitimise Bitcoin turned it into another risk-off asset that algorithms sell automatically when drawdowns breach thresholds.

But here’s the thing: the exact bottom number doesn’t matter to anyone with a time horizon longer than 6 months. What matters is whether you can execute trades, manage risk, and access your funds when the market is in maximum chaos.

What Actually Matters During a Bear Market

CryptoTicker’s analysis (https://cryptoticker.io/en/bitcoin-price-prediction-february-2026/) puts the February trading range at $64,000–$75,000, with less than 10% odds of reclaiming $100K before month-end. CNBC's roundup of 2026 predictions (https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/08/bitcoin-btc-price-predictions-for-2026.html) shows a massive spread: $75K to $225K, with Standard Chartered cutting its target from $300K to $150K and CoinShares projecting more constructive price action in the second half of the year.

If you’re trading through this — not just holding and hoping — the platform you’re on is your actual edge. During the February 5 crash, multiple exchanges experienced withdrawal freezes and API throttling during peak stress. That’s the moment where platform infrastructure becomes the difference between managing your position and watching it get liquidated while you can’t log in.

I’ve been running futures positions through Bitunix during this volatility. A few things that matter in practice: their Hedge Mode lets you hold simultaneous long and short positions on the same pair — critical when you don’t know if $65K is support or a speed bump on the way to $54K. Their Guaranteed Stop Loss feature executes at your exact trigger price even during extreme gaps — the kind of feature you don’t appreciate until you see your normal stop-loss skip 3% during a liquidation cascade. And their Copy Trading system lets you mirror traders who’ve navigated bear markets, with transparent win rates, drawdown data, and configurable risk controls.

Ranked in the top 10 on CoinGlass for open interest, over $5 billion in daily volume, 1:1 Proof of Reserves verified monthly via Merkle Tree, and $42.5 million in insurance coverage through Fireblocks. They recently won Best Growing Exchange 2026 from CEXfinder.

Enjoy the 700 reward bonus on Bitunix

The Synthesis

Willy Woo is probably right that the bear trend is strengthening. The $100-to-billions math is definitely right that long-term holders get rewarded obscenely. And the bottom-callers on X will mostly be wrong about the exact number.

The actual question isn’t “where does Bitcoin bottom?” The actual question is: when the bottom arrives — whether that’s $60K, $50K, or $40K — will you be in a position to act? Will your exchange be online? Will your risk management tools work? Will you have dry powder deployed at the right levels?

Every crypto winter has produced generational wealth for people who were positioned correctly. Not people who predicted the bottom. People who survived it.

Disclaimer: This is not financial advice. Trading digital assets involves significant risk. Do your own research before making investment decisions.

Follow me: bintangtobing.com/links